Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9801 - 9820
of 13,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
United States, 389 F.3d 1219, 1224 (Fed. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:38 pm
California Newspapers Partnership d/b/a ANG Newspapers (32-CA-19276-1; 350 NLRB No. 89) San Francisco Bay Area, CA Sept. 10, 2007. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 11:05 pm
But in an Apple v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:22 pm
United States does not apply to Fog’s surveillance. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:48 am
California. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state and administrative courts in North Carolina, before the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 1:55 pm
Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
State Bar of Wisconsin, 19-831Issue: Whether Lathrop v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:47 pm
The second involves the interception of Internet-based communications and is targeted at foreigners who are not within the United States, but may also inadvertently acquire the communications of U.S. persons. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 6:56 pm
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999), and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:59 pm
.), a recent United States Tax Court opinion emanating from California. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
On Sept. 18, 2009, a class action lawsuit - Case No. 09-CV-1084 - was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of investors who purchased securities issued by Medical Provider Financial Corp. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Scott Michelman, of California (Jay Rorty, of California, & John Reinstein with him) for the defendant. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
United States that the evacuation order was legal. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:46 pm
Review Granted in California Water Impact Network On November 14, 2018, the California Supreme Court granted review of the previously published Second District case of California Water Impact Network v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 3:36 pm
And while the right to water is today a momentous global problem, it is also a serious dilemma in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:30 am
Legarde learned in December 2018 that Plaintiff had returned to the United States, "Ms. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The bill would introduce new powers to deal with serious disruption caused by protesters, including allowing the Secretary of State to bring civil proceedings against campaigners. [read post]
