Search for: "BES v. State" Results 9821 - 9840 of 68,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
They want access to our markets without being held responsible for the damage they are causing to consumers here in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
In addition to being a reprehensible way to treat a colleague, the four Justices' evident attitude of entitlement to the Chief Justice's vote on every important issue could also prove counterproductive. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm by pgbarnes
Senior officials and other powerful interests within the agency don’t like being investigated or even second-guessed. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
According to the Court's analysis, there being a number of states authorizing the medical use of marijuana only strengthens its conclusions as to congressional power: "Congress could have rationally concluded that the aggregate impact on the national market of all the transactions exempted from federal supervision is unquestionably substantial. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:31 pm
It states: "Now if an offender with a history of being a violent sex offender kidnaps a 5-year-old child from the bedroom of her parents' home in the middle of the night, rapes her repeatedly, causing severe permanent physical and psychological damage, and then cuts off both of her arms, this offender is ineligible for the death penalty following a full trial, due process and unanimous jury verdict no matter what the state law provides. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:18 pm
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Olsen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court decided whether a state can require a voter to present a photo ID before casting a ballot (Crawford v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am by Anita Davies, Matrix
In such cases the court is not discussing the truth or reasonableness of any of the doctrines of the religious association, but as stated by Lord Davey in General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland v Overtoun [1904] AC 515 (1904 7 F (HL) 1): “The more humble, but not useless, function of the civil Court is to determine whether the trusts imposed upon property by the founders of the trust are being duly observed. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:49 am by Kashmir Hill
[Reuters] * Arizona state law criminalizing the act of being an immigrant roils the state and the nation. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:26 am by Jocelyn Hutton
It is widely accepted as a matter of public policy that there is a negative effect on an innocent person’s reputation in publishing that he or she is being investigated by the police or another state organisation. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
However, he doubts that it will make a practical difference in many cases since, even if no unfair advantage is taken and no detriment inflicted, the chances of there being a likelihood of confusion will generally prevent the later mark being registered].This Kat expected the CJEU to go along with AG Wahl's Opinion, which it more or less did. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:19 pm by Abbie Peterson
§ 24-10-106(1)(f) waives immunity if the injury results from the public entity’s failure to keep the public facility “in the same general state of being, repair, or efficiency as initially constructed. [read post]