Search for: "Court v. State" Results 9821 - 9840 of 208,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2020, 2:07 pm by Liskow & Lewis
The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion today in Energy Transfer Partners, L.P v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
Supreme Court has denied the motion filed by the 27 Republican State Attorney Generals who filed an amicus brief in support of Community Financial Services Association in CFSA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 9:06 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
That reasoning is inconsistent with the Court’s opinion in Universal Camera v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
” In response to Trump’s feeble attempts to keep his cases in his home court, courts be like: Case citation: Trump v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:07 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:46 pm by Staff
SECOND OFFENSE DUI REDUCED to FIRST OFFENSE REGULAR DUI- State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:33 am by Vin Bonventre
The Supreme Court today ruled in favor of the baker in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 11:49 am
The Ohio Supreme Court's docket this week included oral arguments on three cases examining various aspects of the state's sex offender registration and notification statute, the latest in a line of cases that answer legal questions that have arisen since the law was revised in conformity with the Adam Walsh Act in 2008. [ CourtNews ]Heard yesterday was a case out of Wayne County (State of Ohio v [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:42 pm by Staff
SUPER EXTREME DUI REDUCED to REGULAR DUI- State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2018] UKUT 355 (AAC) This case considered the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 upon the decision-makers in the housing benefit system and the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal hearing appeals from local authority decisions – in claims relating to periods before the regulations governing the removal of the spare room subsidy, otherwise known as the… [read post]