Search for: "Early v. Doe"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 11,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm
Narechania tackles precisely same issue - the Supreme Court's scrutiny of "exceptional" patent rules - but he does so using a new methodology, and a new framing for what the Court is up to.1. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
This is not normally how settlements are done – even at the Copyright Board.The deal represents about a 50% (or even an 800% based upon the existing minimum rate) increase over the current rates, which should have gone significantly down rather than up after the 2004 CCH v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 7:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
The idea that shareholders have the right to make the final decision about an unsolicited tender offer does not necessarily follow, for example, from the mere fact that shareholders have voting rights. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
After the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:41 am
The scene is a series of Democratic primary races, and the locale is Brooklyn, New York, circa the 1970s and early 1980s. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Contra Shugerman, it does not matter if Congress authorized ad [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:34 pm
Because of its short timeline, the CRA has teeth only when three criteria are satisfied: (1) there’s a change in presidential administration, (2) the new President’s agenda has the support of both houses of Congress, and (3) the prior administration either (a) failed to promulgate important regulations early enough to avoid the 60-day dragnet or (b) failed to submit the regulation to Congress. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
A jury said yes, and the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Hicks v. [read post]
22 May 2025, 11:20 am
" McCain v. [read post]
Ireland: Better late than never – the Defamation (Amendment) Bill 2024 is finally here – Eoin O’Dell
21 Aug 2024, 4:53 pm
On this basis, it does not seem to me that a serious harm test would fail the rationality standard of review set out by Finlay CJ in Tuohy v Courtney (above). [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Serbia and Croatia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
The Administrator filed an action on October 29, 2019 encaptioned Estate of Sandor v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 5:36 am
Does this increase the digital divide? [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:07 pm
” In InteliClear, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 11:30 am
Improved nutritional status of the individual should also be considered early to prevent wound worsening. [read post]
