Search for: "Park v State"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 11,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2023, 6:16 am
To be sure, in Shurtleff v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm
Hr’g Tr., Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 11:32 pm
State AG: DAFs run risk for money laundering. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Such are the fundamental philosophical lessons of the Sixth District Court of Appeal’s recently published opinion in Save Our Big Trees v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:44 am
from 1997-2003 was Imam at the Finsbury Park Mosque, London. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:58 am
Among the papers was the document filed in the recorder's office - a repository mainly for land transactions - in which Cox captioned his case, "State of Alaska, a fiction, plaintiff, v Schaeffer Cox, a natural Man, victim and witness, waiving no rights, EVER. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:02 am
From Cook v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:37 pm
Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Clinton v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 6:01 pm
Citing Winrod v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:58 am
Among the papers was the document filed in the recorder's office - a repository mainly for land transactions - in which Cox captioned his case, "State of Alaska, a fiction, plaintiff, v Schaeffer Cox, a natural Man, victim and witness, waiving no rights, EVER. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm
Under the Revised Code, a TMUD is generally defined as “a project that consists of new construction or the redevelopment, rehabilitation, expansion, or other improvement of vacant buildings or structures, or a combination of the foregoing, and that: (a) Will have a transformational economic impact on the development site and the surrounding area; (b) Integrates some combination of retail, office, residential, recreation, structured parking, and other similar uses into one mixed use… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
Or as John Marshall said in Gibbons v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:21 pm
In Savea v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:40 am
.'" Nollan v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:21 pm
In Savea v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:55 pm
Hupp v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
