Search for: "People v. More" Results 9821 - 9840 of 43,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2021, 1:03 am by CMS
In this post, Jessica Eaton, who is a trainee solicitor at CMS, comments on the unanimous decision handed down in February 2021 by the UK Supreme Court in the case of TW Logistics Ltd v Essex County Council and Anor [2021] UKSC 4. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
 Specifically, it was found that 119 people had access to the records showing Sir Cliff was under investigation (making identification highly unlikely). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
  In commentary at Slate, Amy Barasch echoes the argument made by the United States yesterday, telling readers that, if the Court “agrees to narrow the definition of what ‘force’ means, more people will be shot by their partners, more law enforcement personnel will be hurt, and we may be less likely to stop future mass killings. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
More particularly, is the protection of children a superior value which the courts must strive to preserve even at the expense of transparency? [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 12:14 pm by David Aronberg
More importantly, should people—including judges—hold you responsible for knowing something if you should know it but don’t? [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Clear labelling of incentivised posts is required under UK consumer protection law, so that people are not misled. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm by Rick
” The article discusses an evidentiary ruling in the unpublished case of People v. [read post]