Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 55,711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2018, 12:00 am
In Moore v. [read post]
Dangerous Decision in Oracle v. Google: Federal Circuit Reverses Sensible Lower Court Ruling on APIs
9 May 2014, 12:25 pm
We're still digesting today's lengthy decision in the Oracle v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:34 am
In D & D Land Holdings v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Toth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
Marbury v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:57 pm
The Wall Street Journal is running an excellent editorial discussing United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
In Neissel v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 2:26 pm
Baypo Limited Partnership v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 6:26 pm
Larson, who called Bryant's actions "really powerful impeachment evidence. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:10 pm
In its decision, the majority reiterated its Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:49 am
Kimbrough v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:41 am
Woolworth Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 2:31 am
According to the majority, British forces have the power to detain prisoners for periods exceeding 96 hours if necessary for imperative reasons of security (implicitly conferred by UN Security Council resolutions), but the procedures for doing so do not comply with ECHR, art 5(4) as there is no effective right for the prisoners to challenge their detention. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:01 am
In Kassem v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am
In his third essay, Waxman extracted lessons for current debates about war powers from Madison’s theory of war powers and their application. [read post]
4 May 2013, 1:46 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
Ferguson, Korematsu v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 1:39 pm
Perdue (Separation of Powers; Judgment Funds) on 12/19/17.U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564 and other cases, the Appellate Division explained that "[b]ecause of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court -- in cases where judicial authority is challenged -- acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers". [read post]
