Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 40,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2009, 5:45 am
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:01 am
Department of Labor (DOL) has proposed to amend the Regulations implementing the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) by revising the definition of “spouse” in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Department of Labor (DOL) has proposed to amend the Regulations implementing the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) by revising the definition of “spouse” in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 8:04 am
Case citation: Hardin v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:15 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
Indeed, in striking down the aggregate contribution limits in McCutcheon v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:34 am
McCormick v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm
But as the transcripts show, there is still plenty of drama: If the court’s four liberals are already resigned to their sure-to-be scathing dissent, they aren’t going down without a fight. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 11:03 am
We agree with Tony Mauro and Lyle Denniston: It all comes down to Justice Kennedy. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Berghuis v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:57 pm
Today, together with the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Freedom of Expression, EFF submitted an amicus brief in Lee v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:57 pm
It allows Texas residents or the state attorney general to sue platforms for any kind of negative treatment to a user or a post, including take down and down-ranking posts, and suspending, shadowing, or canceling accounts.The Supreme Court must consider whether the district court’s order was in the public interest and whether it correctly applied accepted standards. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:38 am
The case is Silvester v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:22 am
’” United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm
Ultimately, disputes about contract meaning and parol evidence such as this often boil down to a single question: credibility. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
The Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
