Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 28,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2014, 8:44 am
judgment in the case of Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT [2014] EWHC 1666 (Pat) (22 May 2014). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm
” On petition for a writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Bilski v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:55 am
” On this point, the majority opinion repeatedly referred to Zauderer v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 2:12 pm
In Westnav Container Services Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
In 2003, California lawmakers enacted Labor Code Section 1102.6, setting forth a framework for whistleblower retaliation claims that varied from the burden-shifting test established by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:15 pm
Jordan testified, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:44 am
In Araiza v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:55 pm
” The defendants argued that they should not be liable for “exceeding authorized access” in light of the recent Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:03 am
The judge stated that if the contribution included something else (e.g. new physical combination of hardware), it may be entitled to protection. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:44 am
Earlier this week, in Lowry v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 6:07 am
Spicer v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:10 am
In George v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:35 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am
Pursuant to that statute, "[a] sworn juror must be discharged when facts come to light, which were not known at the time the jury was empaneled, indicating that the juror is 'grossly unqualified to serve'" (People v Harris, 99 NY2d 202, 212 [2002], quoting CPL 270.35 [1]). [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Supreme Court Order (01/11/12): In light of the United States Supreme Court's order vacating our judgment in the above-entitled case and remanding the cause to this court "for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:25 am
Such individuals are sometimes referred to as Beck objectors in light of a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Commc’ns Workers v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:37 am
Karl V. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:29 pm
Why there is Kent V. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:23 pm
The Supreme Court in Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]
