Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 10,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 3:30 pm
Mark Brener, et. al. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
[27] One main factor of consideration is whether or not the foreign manufacturer has assigned United States trademark rights and their registration to the designated exclusive United States importer.[28] United States and international antitrust and free competition policies intersect with trademark law in that the designated United States importer is usually concerned with gray market goods because they are sold for less,… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:07 am
United States Polo Association Inc., defendants-appellees
NEW YORK COUNTYInsurance LawPolice Report, NF-2 Form Enough to Show Potential Merit to Insurer's Claims Assignor Employed Lenox Hill Radiology PC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 2:28 pm
The judgment in Case C-244/06 Dynamic Medien Vertriebs GmbH v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 3:26 am
Because the current standard requires a mark to be "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States," 15 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Dilanchian), Review of National Innovation System: (IP Menu News) Bahrain Bahrain gives itself longer to refuse Madrid marks: (I [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:13 pm
Software AG, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
United States Polo Ass'n, Inc., No. 06-3691 (2d Cir. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 3:00 pm
A couple of interesting dissents filed today in a denial of rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:53 am
In addition, Fluke asserts that the evidence shows that the respondents have a large manufacturing capacity and maintain large inventories of DMMs in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:49 am
" In addition to the amendments to the rules, the United States Supreme Court adopted revisions for each of the appended illustrated federal forms. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:23 am
Slip Op. 09813 at *13-14, but, in doing so, specifically stated that it did not recognize the famous marks doctrine as an independent theory of liability under state law. [read post]
Funrise Toys Sues Over Copyright and Trademark Infringement Of Its Bubble Toy Machine In Los Angeles
3 Mar 2008, 12:26 am
The case is titled: Funrise, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 8:48 pm
Last year, on interlocutory appeal in State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 2:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:51 pm
See Marks v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release… [read post]
