Search for: "Court v. State" Results 9841 - 9860 of 208,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2008, 3:13 pm
  Higginson’s article discusses oral advocacy before the United States Supreme Court and includes audio clips [...] [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm by Zach Zagger
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website, JURIST news archive] Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:57 am by Donald Clarke
On Oct. 6, 2022, the European Court of Human Rights issued a decision, Liu v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle, "State Supreme Court unanimous ruling allows big fines for unsafe workplaces. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle, "State Supreme Court unanimous ruling allows big fines for unsafe workplaces. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:45 am by Erik Eisenheim
These decisions are more misguided and indeed may possibly be more corrupt than the decisions reached by the West Virginia Supreme Court that led to the now-famous United States Supreme Court decision Caperton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
"...Pursuant to this Court's decision in Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:07 am by Howard Friedman
In Arizona, a physician and the Arizona Medical Association have filed a declaratory judgment action in an Arizona trial court asking the court to clarify which of two competing laws on abortion is in effect in the state. [read post]
28 May 2025, 5:01 am by Steven Calabresi
[The Supreme Court very strongly hinted that it will overrule, or greatly narrow, Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm by stu@crimapp.com
On January 19th, 2011, the Court decided Harrington v Richter, Supreme Court NO. 09-587. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:40 pm by Daily Record Staff
Holding: the court denied appellant’s motion properly. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 6:36 am
The Washington State Supreme Court has held that an action on a post-dissolution claim must be filed within two years after dissolution. [read post]