Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 9841 - 9860
of 29,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2016, 7:42 pm
’ ” Sprint Spectrum, L.P., 606 F. [read post]
29 May 2016, 2:43 pm
PC Onsite, 561 F. 3d 983 (Ninth Circuit). [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am
The Tangled Webb in California Law The Webb case received some attention after the California Court of Appeals reversed a trial court’s entry of JNOV for defendant Special Electric on the so-called sophisticated intermediary defense. [read post]
29 May 2016, 6:45 am
, 500 F.3d 1047, 1062 (9th Cir.2007). [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:00 pm
Conagra Foods, Inc., 920 F.Supp.2d 995 (D.Minn.2013), vacated on other grounds, 747 F.3d 1025 (8th Cir.2014); and Abdelhak v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
” Justice Alito (joined by Justice Thomas) observed that several of the defendants were originally sentenced to death, and suggested that the death-sentencing juries may have already engaged in the “individualized sentencing procedure that considers [the defendants’] youth and immaturity” required by Miller. [read post]
27 May 2016, 7:50 am
L. 114-153 § 2(f), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:06 pm
To the contrary, it says “[i]f a probationer violates a condition of probation . . . , the court . . . may continue the defendant on probation, with or without modifying the conditions, . . . or may order that charges as to which prosecution has been deferred be brought to trial . . . . [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:06 pm
To the contrary, it says “[i]f a probationer violates a condition of probation . . . , the court . . . may continue the defendant on probation, with or without modifying the conditions, . . . or may order that charges as to which prosecution has been deferred be brought to trial . . . . [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:50 am
The Defendants did not admit all of these facts requiring ultimate proof at trial. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
Newman, No. 13-1837, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014). [read post]
25 May 2016, 5:47 pm
A Las Vegas Judge ordered an assistant Public Defender handcuffed and placed in the box. [read post]
25 May 2016, 3:30 pm
E has killed F recklessly.4. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:36 am
After the fee decision was issued, defendant remembered the Rule 68 offer and asked the court to reconsider the attorneys' fees motion. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am
Vice Chancellor Laster explained that, “[f]or enhanced scrutiny to apply, the board’s actions ‘need not actually prevent the shareholders from attaining any success in seating one or more nominees in a contested election for directors and the election contest need not involve a challenge for outright control’ . . . [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:16 pm
Foster, ___ F.3d ___ (4th Cir. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Endrew F. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:27 pm
See Spiegla, 481 F.3dat 964 (7th Cir. 2007) (holding that defendants had notwaived challenge to holding in first appeal where issuenot raised on remand in district court or initial briefingbecause intervening decision was issued after appellatebriefing); Mendenhall, 26 F.3d at 1583 (law of the case didnot apply where new decision issued while case on appeal);Morris v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
Gast, 535 F. [read post]
