Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 9841 - 9860
of 10,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
" The majority pointed out that although the Act does not conclusively resolve the issue, it is consistent with processing a 9(e)(1) petition supported by preagreement signatures. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:14 pm
However, Prince notes that critics "are likely wrong for two fundamental reasons," namely that (1) no burden was created by the statute that would "unduly burden" interstate commerce, and (2) "in order to violate the Dormant Commerce Clause a statute must not be authorized by Congress or be a traditional state police power. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
(2) does the Congress as an institution have standing? [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
Ct. 2274 n.1. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 1:42 am
Linda Greenhouse's meditation on John Roberts's dissent in the global warming case (Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:32 am
But it's all still as murky as a double-espresso, caveats Bob. 2. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 11:59 am
.; and John Donofrio of Visteon Corp. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 8:39 pm
" In fact, he only decided to go to law school after working on the John F. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
Consequently, the court certified two questions to the New York Court of Appeals: (1) Does New York Recognize the Famous Marks Doctrine? [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
See, e.g., Construction Products, 346 NLRB No. 60, slip op. at 1 fn. 2 (2006); McKee Electric Co., 349 NLRB No. 46, slip op. at 4 fn. 14 (2007). [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:32 pm
Respondent asserted that during the lull, it had continued to invest in and expand its business, opening a second restaurant in 2003.Petitioner argued that its delay was not unreasonable because (1) it was busy with other cancellation proceedings, (2) it thought respondent was operating a bagel shop in New York (where Petitioner did not have rights), and (3) only in September 2003 did Respondent add pizza as a menu item.Petitioner Jansen was on constructive notice of… [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
But the two Justices who filed a separate "statement," John Paul Stevens and Anthony M. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
Part 1 is here; Part 2 -- in which Denise is misquoted by the BBC (*sigh*) -- is here. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
Part 1 is here; Part 2 -- in which Denise is misquoted by the BBC (*sigh*) -- is here. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 7:11 am
Vinson, a Kroger customer;and John W. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 7:46 am
This argument reasons that (1) the free speech principle protects the communication of ideas (the major premise); (2) pornography communicates no ideas (the minor premise); (3) therefore pornography is not protected by the free speech principle. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:12 am
" (See prior related postings on the litigation 1, 2.) [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:48 am
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and related regulations establish their own rules for structured settlement annuities including laws for structured settlement recipients to qualify for an IRC 104(a)(1) or (2) exclusion. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:01 am
According to Van Biema, polls show that 2/3 of Americans believe that the Bible contains the answers to "all or most of life's basic questions" but 1/2 of Americans cannot even name one Gospel. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:49 am
Below are the results for all Chief Justices dating back to John Marshall: Chief Justice Average Annual Salary* (in 2006 dollars) 1 Charles Evans Hughes (1930-1941) $291,664 2 Melville Fuller (1888-1910) $259,728 3 Edward White (1910-1921) $252,642 4 Harlan Stone (1941-1946) $250,243 5 Warren Burger (1969-1986) $249,256 6 Earl Warren (1953-1969) $246,771 7 Morrison Waite (1874-1888) $215,662 8 William H. [read post]
