Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 9841 - 9860
of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2009, 3:16 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
Article III simply declines to abrogate certain State immunities from suit, see Hans v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
” [A reminder that court-ordered identity and age verification requirements likely violate the First Amendment; the other claims may do so as well.] [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
(State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:44 pm
See Aleman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 11:28 am
Abbott: The Court does not purport to decide whether a State may base a districting plan on something other than total population, but the Court, picking up a key component of the Solicitor General’s argument, suggests that the use of total population is supported by the Constitution’s formulafor allocating seats in the House of Representatives among the States. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:31 am
Hotel and Suites, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
The statute at issue states that the Director may not authorize an inter partes review to be instituted unless the Director determines that the information presented in the petition filed under section 311 and any response filed under section 313 shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 12:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently issued its decision in Van Loon v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 11:03 pm
In Continental Casualty et al. v United States of America et al, U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:08 am
She then addressed the Enomoto v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
State regulation may be more protective or comprehensive “in various ways including adopting protective standards, covering all aquatic resources in the state, not just waters covered by the Clean Water Act, or utilizing other statutes and regulations such as smart growth requirements. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
For example, in the seminal case of United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm
In their review of the articles, state parties will have to acknowledge the invocation of Articles V and VI. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
We’ve blogged about state laws directed at ownership of (and privacy regarding) employee social media [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:30 am
Comer, Town of Greece v. [read post]
