Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 9841 - 9860 of 28,445
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm by Amy Howe
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Ronald Mann
I would not have been surprised if this little statutory case had been a letdown after the constitutional concerns with which the justices began their morning in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Lisi v Lowenstein Sandler LLP  2017 NY Slip Op 32411(U)  November 16, 2017  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 160298/2016  Judge Shirley Werner Kornreich finds that where a claim might be stated, damages cannot be linked to the shortcomings. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 11:30 am by Dennis Crouch
 Dmitry Karshtedt This morning’s argument in Oil States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:16 am by Amy Howe
[Editor’s note: An earlier version of this post ran on August 14, as an introduction to the blog’s symposium on Christie v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Orin Kerr
The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an important electronic privacy case, United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:53 am by John Jascob
The petition also raises a series of challenges to what it argues were erroneous factual findings and misapplications of properly-stated rules of law (Knight v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 7:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Back in 2014, when the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:30 am by Melissa Milewski
Here is a brief excerpt from the archival record of the case:"City of Harrodsburg v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:03 am by Walter Olson
Blaisdell symbolizes the overthrow of the courts’ willingness to enforce the Constitution’s language providing that “No State shall…pass any…Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts. [read post]