Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 9841 - 9860
of 13,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:33 pm
petition of the day is: Title: Rast v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The federal court — indicating that respondent may have violated added requirements to report expenses in excess of $100, to limit hiring at his law firm and restrict support staff to two full-time staff members — referred the matter for prosecution by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988747 [SD NY 2006]). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
United States (09-1298); Boeing Company v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:21 pm
In the more recent case of Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
Nicastro, U.S., No. 09-1343 (certiorari petition granted 9/28/10); Goodyear Luxembourg Tires SA v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
The Ninth Circuit’s precedent in United Steel Workers Int'l Union v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:41 pm
See SCOTUS blog, petition of the day. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:46 pm
The case of Al-Odah v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm
United States, 10-6549, relisted 1/7, 1/14; and Howes v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:38 am
(Eugene Volokh) The 2–1 decision is Maksym v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:29 am
United States (Granted )Docket: 10-6549Issue(s): Validity of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act and its implementing regulations Certiorari stage documents:Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Petitioner's replyResponse to Solicitor General's letterLetter from the Solicitor General Call for the views of the Solicitor General: Title: Miccosukee Tribe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The Court also filled out its March 3 argument calendar by re-setting some previously granted cases: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:34 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
United States. [read post]
