Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 9841 - 9860
of 178,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 9:14 am
“’Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success in showing that race played a predominant role in the… Continue reading The post “Federal judge grants injunction in Boston redistricting case: ‘The ball is back in the City Council’s court. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:13 am
Schonberg alleges "Despite the living will and Plaintiff's wishes that Maribeth be disconnected from the ventilator, defendant's physicians refused and kept Maribeth surviving artificially for approximately two weeks. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:43 am
I didn’t intend to write a second post (here’s the first) on the ever rising tide of excessive fee litigation, but the LinkedIn algorithm, responding to my posting of my first blog post on this issue, hand delivered me another great graphic, this one by Sompo International, on the same topic. [read post]
9 May 2023, 7:23 am
LEXIS 288, the Court of Chancery denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to enforce a Non-Compete against a former employer (in part) because the restrictive covenant was overbroad with respect to plaintiff’s legitimate business interests and consequently unreasonable. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:29 am
Plaintiff also raises a malicious prosecution claim, which would cover any harm that accrued following plaintiff's arrest. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:10 am
Plaintiffs, The Satanic Temple Inc. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:05 am
West’s request was flatly denied.The two plaintiffs devised a "joint statement of faith" for purposes of the lawsuit, even though they come from different religious traditions. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:00 am
In turn, the plaintiff’s claims against J.R. [read post]
8 May 2023, 2:14 pm
According to Texas’s modified comparative fault law, a plaintiff’s award of damages is reduced by an amount commensurate to the plaintiff’s degree of fault. [read post]
8 May 2023, 1:54 pm
At the merits stage, the District Court again rejected Plaintiffs’ challenges to the rule under the Chevron framework. [read post]
8 May 2023, 1:50 pm
The Second Circuit’s requirement of a showing of retaliatory intent “significantly raised the threshold for Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower plaintiffs,” as the Seyfarth Shaw law firm put it in a memo published just after the Second Circuit issued its opinion. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:51 pm
As a result of the Plaintiff’s silence and lack of consent to the layoff, the Court of Appeal found that unless an employee takes positive action confirming their agreement to a temporary layoff, silence alone will not be considered condonation of a temporary lay off. [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:23 am
” On September 4, 2021, the plaintiff sent a copy of the summons and complaint via certified mail to the defendant’s attorney at her firm’s address in Marietta, Georgia. [read post]
8 May 2023, 10:49 am
In a way, from the perspective of an insurer, it’s a form of a death spiral, as more and more plaintiffs’ lawyers entering the area lead to more and more suits being filed, and more suits being filed leads to more and more defense costs being incurred, leading to more and more settlements being paid so as to avoid large defense bills, which in turn leads to yet more suits being filed as plaintiffs’ lawyers see those settlement numbers and decide to chase… [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:58 am
Therefore, the use of the plaintiff’s trade marks by the defendant does not affect the origin function of the mark. [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:00 am
But, in this instance, the plaintiff clearly testified she fell on a “wet step. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:10 am
However, “[t]hat showing is generally not made when” a defendant’s conduct “produces injuries to a fellow commercial actor that in turn affect the plaintiff. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:04 am
Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s bad–faith breach and Chapter 541 causes of action, arguing that they are barred by the statute of limitations. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:38 am
Issue: Did the trial court err in classifying the LHWCA funds as Plaintiff’s separate property? [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:00 am
The court determined that the Plaintiff had properly asserted that the tree fell within the Defendant’s right-of-way. [read post]
