Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 9841 - 9860 of 55,711
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2021, 3:14 am by Dan Zammit
This power is set out in section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, allowing the court to review any ‘disposition’ of assets intended to reduce the ‘financial relief’ of their spouse. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 1:43 am by JR Chaves
Un reciente auto de la Sala tercera del Tribunal Supremo de 25 de febrero de 2021(rec.1481/2019) constituye un espléndido ejemplo del buen hacer jurisdiccional con una formación de sala especializada y con ideas claras, bajo la pluma de un ponente extraordinario, Don Francisco José Navarro Sanchís, que ya nos había demostrado en el pasado su destreza expositiva, lucidez argumental y su defensa de las libertades y derechos, con elegancia y sin desfallecimiento. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The ability of newspapers generally and, in particular, the defendant’s publications, to summarise to the Judge’s satisfaction the burden and content of his earlier decision on 11 February 2021 in Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch), evidently irked him. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:57 am by Stephen Sachs
In the Supreme Court's recent standing decision, Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:14 am by Patricia Salkin
Upon review of the record, the court found that the County did not issue the second stop work order due to the electrical utility trenching a ditch to bury a power line on the property. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:39 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Sole Cleaning Inc v Chu (“Chu”), an individual’s disparaging social media statements about her former employer were found not to be defamatory. [read post]
High Court Justice Nor Bee Ariffin held that the 1986 ban exceeded the constitutional powers afforded to the government. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 8:14 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Instead, the Court will consider, in any given case, whether a case-by-case privilege should be recognized, with reference to the four “Wigmore criteria”, as adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada in Slavutych v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 8:14 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Instead, the Court will consider, in any given case, whether a case-by-case privilege should be recognized, with reference to the four “Wigmore criteria”, as adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada in Slavutych v. [read post]