Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 9841 - 9858 of 9,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
     August 24, 2006Re:  Professor X And The Conservative Judges Of Reagan And The Two Bushes.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:31 pm
(Full Board participated.) *** United States Postal Service (9-CA-42466; 347 NLRB No. 89) Columbus, OH Aug. 11, 2006. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 12:11 pm
Until the Supreme Court's decision in June in Hamdan v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
Care to prevent HIV infection in prison: a moral right recognized by Canada, while the United States lags behind. 37 U. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
One can find in the Yugoslavia court cases many instances of criminal liability for wanton and disproportionate devastation, involving, say, a Serb paramilitary unit deliberately trashing a village. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
Circuit panel (including John Roberts) when initially rejecting Hamdan's arguments last year.Since the late 1980s, when the Senate first began to ratify international human rights conventions, it has always insisted on this reservation: The United States commits to the principles of the treaty, but not to their incorporation into U.S. domestic law. [read post]
12 May 2006, 5:46 am
For the first time in its history, NSSTA gathered outside the continental United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
21 Nov 2005, 1:03 pm
What is less understood, however, is how the new law could hurt the entire United States economy, and consequently, the financial wellbeing of all Americans. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
UTR also lobbies for the following question to be posed to Judge Roberts: "How does it feel to be the fifth-hottest [male] federal judge in the United States? [read post]
10 Aug 2005, 3:23 am
[JURIST] Public Advocate of the United States [advocacy website], a right-wing group based in Virginia, announced [press release] Wednesday that they would become the first conservative group to oppose the nomination of John Roberts [JURIST news archive] to the US Supreme Court. [read post]