Search for: "State v. Word" Results 9841 - 9860 of 40,669
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at Townhall, James Burling maintains that “[t]he just-ended Supreme Court term went exceedingly well for individual liberty[:] From property rights to government agencies to offensive words, there were triumphs for individual rights and a pushback against the encroaching regulatory state. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 6:01 pm by Marty Lederman
  And several Justices of the Supreme Court--sometimes even a majority--will, in at least some important cases (e.g., Trump v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 5:03 pm by Larry
Apects Furniture International v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Paul IV’s successor, Pope Pius IV, enforced the creation of other ghettos in most Italian towns, and his successor, Pope Pius V, recommended them to other bordering states. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 5:52 am by David Mills
(Toronto: Thomson Reuters) at page 3-2 [2] Ignani v Ignani, 2009 CarswellOnt 6115, [2009] O.J. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" In the words of the Appellate Division, "The employment of a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing and without a statement of reasons in the absence of a demonstration that the termination was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible or an illegal purpose, or in violation of statutory or decisional law. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" In the words of the Appellate Division, "The employment of a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing and without a statement of reasons in the absence of a demonstration that the termination was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible or an illegal purpose, or in violation of statutory or decisional law. [read post]