Search for: "United States v. California" Results 9841 - 9860 of 13,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am by Conor McEvily
Much of the news coverage of the Court focuses on yesterday’s grants: In United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 25, 2008 United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Advertising-based content distribution patent fails Bilski test: Ultramercial, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm by P.J. Blount
– The Volokh Conspiracy Are Historical Cell-Site Data Protected Under the Fourth Amendment After United States v. [read post]
Like all federal cases, Perry started in a District Court, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm by Aaron Pelley
Sandoval: The Court found that in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Entertainment Merchants Ass'n, 131 S.Ct. 2729 (2011)), videotaping animal cruelty (United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
Otherwise, we have not yet had a truly uniform statute of limitations throughout the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:41 am by Evan Lee
” Kavanaugh renewed his query about practicality during the argument of Allon Kedem, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, representing the United States as amicus curiae in support of Idaho. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am by John Elwood
California, 220153Issue: Whether California’s sanctions against Texas and Texans – prohibiting state-funded or state-sponsored travel to Texas because Texas protects the religious freedom of faith-based child welfare providers within its borders – are born of religious animus and violate the Constitution’s privileges and immunities clause, interstate commerce clause and guarantee of equal protection. [read post]