Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 9841 - 9860 of 24,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm by Sophia Cope
The actions Cisco took in the United States were sufficient to allow the case to go forward here. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:05 am
United States, No. 06-5754 (2007) (Slip Op. 7) (emphasis added) He later explained that "we permit courts of appeals to adopt a presumption of reasonableness. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:24 am
The Statue of Liberty, for example, came to New York as a symbol of friendship between France and the United States, Alito said, and only later became viewed as a beacon welcoming immigrants.Similarly -- and here's where Lennon comes in -- the mosaic in Central Park in New York City that displays the word "Imagine" as part of the memorial to John Lennon conveys several messages. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:53 am
Tom F. nondecision by the United States Supreme Court last October. [read post]
The United States’ argument opened with the following: After watching video of [Tsarnaev] by himself personally placing a shrapnel bomb behind a group of children at the Boston Marathon, the jury in this case returned a nuanced verdict unanimously recommending capital punishment for that specific deliberate act. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 11:14 pm
The place where they are committed, must be the place where his offence is committed, and therefore the place where he should be indicted and tried” (State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:51 am by Meg Martin
Merck unequivocally admitted to the criminal activity taking place in her home over the course of basically a year. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:21 am by Joy Waltemath
The written job description stated that the jobs duties included lifting freight, baggage and other heavy items, up to 70 pounds. [read post]
The Court found that such enforcement would unconstitutionally expand Congress’s power under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution[v]. [read post]