Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 9861 - 9880 of 11,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2022, 1:41 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm case--where the Federal Circuit held that Apple lacked standing to appeal decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) due to a portfolio license it had taken from Qualcomm in 2019--we at least know what the Department of Justice (DOJ) thought. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
So while the USOC has registered TEAM USA for everything from coffee mugs to cowbells, others can arguably use the hashtag #TeamUSA or the phrase “team USA” descriptively when they talk about athletes who represent the United States in the Olympics. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:52 am

 ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us
 © 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:45 am by Adrian P. Thomas
  The Fourth District first reflected on the shifting meanings of the term “limitations” in light of the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Tulsa Professional Collection Services Inc v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But in about a dozen states, the laws remain on the books. [read post]
26 May 2024, 6:57 am by Marie Nganele
(M.F., via e-mail) A: The landmark Florida appellate case defining “material alterations and substantial additions” is a 1971 decision called Sterling Village Condominium Association, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
In so ruling, the Court disapproved of the reasoning in the Sixth Circuit’s 1983 decision in International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
On appeal Miller argues that the state appellate court unreasonably concluded that McShane's performance at sentencing was not deficient or prejudicial, and he further contends that United States v. [read post]