Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 12,455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
Households in the top 0.01% make over $27 million annually, on average. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:51 pm
Further to our January 27, 2011 post, on February 17, 2011, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued the public version of its opinion affirming-in-part and reversing-in-part ALJ Robert K. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 10:42 am
The data in the below tables and in the detailed chart does not include companies conducting Say-On-Pay votes that are mandated by virtue of the company's participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program and also does not include companies that voluntarily held Say-On-Pay votes (e.g., companies which held their annual shareholder meeting shortly before the January 21, 2011 effective date for Say-On-Pay but which nevertheless opted to voluntarily hold a Say-On-Pay… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
Reg. 68483 (Nov. 27, 2006). (3) Id. at 931. (4) Id. citing S. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:07 am
Georges] Avenue (Route 27), Linden, Union County, NJ. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
So hitting his targets will bring Cunningham a cool $1 million for his short-term bonus, and $2.4 million in long-term incentive payments. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
I have looked at the following issues: 1. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
The penalty does not prevent criminal prosecution in appropriate cases. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
It does not follow that the advice has to be accepted or followed nor for that matter, for the advice to be correct. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:17 pm
Also, see #1 above: A portable book is portable, right? [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:45 am
This case does not attract either exception. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[1] A number of recent, post-Frye[2] Board decisions start with this statement, or a similar allocation of burden of proof. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:05 pm
With respect to Appellants’ argument that Franchere does not teach the “wells for containing a fluid sample therein” feature required by claims 1, 12, 27, and 35, Appellants’ argumennt is unpersuasive of reversible error because it fails to address the Examiner’s stated case, which is based on, inter alia, Franchere’s test tubes and the corresponding openings in Franchere’s modular units, as meeting the “wells”… [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm
The table below suggests that where people work (or want to work) does not depend on how much they have in outstanding student loans: Amount of debtLaw firmGovernmentIn-housePublic interestOtherUnemployed or under-employedNone72%12%8%3%5%0%$1-49,99973%12%7%2%6%1%$50,000-99,99973%12%6%2%7%0%$100,000 or more70%12%5%3%6%3% Let’s look at the results another way, namely, how the amount of outstanding student loans varies by type of legal employment: Amount of debtLaw… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
(B) LIMITATION BASED ON AMOUNT OF TAX - In the case of a taxable year to which section 26(a)(2) does not apply, the credit allowed under subpart A for any taxable year (determined after application of paragraph (1)) by reason of subparagraph (A) shall not exceed the excess of -- (i) the sum of the regular tax liability (as defined in section 26(b)) plus the tax imposed by section 55, over (ii) the sum of the credits allowable under subpart A (other than this section) and section… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:47 am
The National Space Society is planning its annual “Legislative Blitz” for February 27 through March 1. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
The Opposition: On October 27, 2010, the borrower’s attorney filed a single page document on which the type was double-spaced. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:10 am
Should it really take 27 weeks or so to change Bud Light Lime to Bud Light Lemon? [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:20 am
" To this, the Court said that the above language does not affirmatively obligate Prudential to provide separate written notice of the conversion privilege. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 3:12 pm
In addition, the re-allocation of goodwill and intangible assets seems to explain why Keurig’s total assets as of June 27, 2009 was revised upward from $112.857 million in its Q3 2009 10-Q report to $240.859 million in its Q3 2010 10-Q report for the same June 27, 2009 date. [read post]
