Search for: "In Interest of Doe"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 135,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2020, 8:55 am
This does not always happen. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:37 pm
Interesting post over at China Business Law on registering IP in Macau, got me to thinking of a company who came to me last year for assistance in pursuing trademark infringement litigation in China. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 7:24 pm
There are numerous interesting features of the case, but I'll focus on just one: The defendant was charged with killing two people in retaliation for providing information against him in a prior case. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 2:19 am
Yet, just because something is legal does not mean it makes a good HR practice. [read post]
16 May 2006, 11:49 am
One of the most interesting developments at the ICC at the moment is the preparation of the confirmation hearing in the case of the first suspect in the custody of the Court, Thomas Lubanga Dyilo from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:00 pm
In case you are interested, here's what the South Carolina Constitution has to say about impeachment. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
There was something interesting in that last list. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 4:02 pm
By the way, Wordcount tells us that "slaw" does not appear in the database, and nor does it appear in the BNC. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
Among other virtues, this resolution of the TAIA question does not predetermine whether the tax power justifies the minimum coverage provision. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 2:37 pm
This rule does not in any way mandate tribal government action. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 6:49 am
Booker does not authorize this. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:04 am
What does this mean for consumers? [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 10:47 am
The notice, however, does not need to be filed before the underlying action has been closed. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 3:13 pm
Note that the New York Post does not suggest any wrongdoing on the part of Counsel Financial. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:07 am
The mere fact that Capt Reh ultimately worked as a trial counsel on a different case with the trial counsel on appellant's case does not by itself create an actual conflict of interest. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:46 am
It may be that one of the joint co-owners lives at the property, and the other does not. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 5:07 pm
Also, watch out for the interest rates creeping up when you were not looking. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 1:31 pm
However, it does provide legal framework for similar claims arising out of a PRA judgment. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:19 am
Joint custody means both parents will have a voice in decision-making involving the child, but does not necessarily imply equal time with both parents. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:29 am
I know this may be a bit beyond the scope of this blog but I ran across a new law review article that may be of interest to scholars who are interested in the right of self-representation. [read post]
