Search for: "In re Means"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 89,779
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm
I just wrote that sentence myself, and I still keep re-reading it, thinking "that can't be true. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:55 am
In re Joel Wiens, Serial No. 78526520 (October 13, 2010) [not precedential].The Examining Attorney relied on dictionary definitions of "jock," a third-party patent registration [What's that? [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:25 am
The first meaning of "trusted", which is the everyday meaning, implies a judgment that a party is unlikely to misbehave. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:40 am
If you have an active or pending family law case, you have likely heard many terms that you’re not familiar with. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
That means the United States has strengthened our ties with another critical Indo-Pacific partner. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 9:00 am
Nations Dear Internet, I hope you’re happy. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 9:40 am
Let's say you're a prosecutor. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
If you're reading this at work, you may be committing a federal crime (depending on where you are reading it, and you're employer's policies about reading the internet). [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:23 pm
(Means they lived ‘in a house or houses’ but sounds more ominous.) [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 11:56 am
It means that, you’re always facing the same side to each other. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
In re Application for Cell Tower Records, supra. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 12:03 am
What does this even mean? [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 4:03 am
After all, it similarly waters down the meaning and significance of being transgender. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:16 am
This means refusing them does not result in a license suspension. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:30 am
The problem is their stories aren’t truthful, not so much in the sense that they’re telling lies, although that happens, but in what they’re leaving out. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:23 pm
This means you must fully pay them, just like taxes and certain other obligations. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
But unlike res judicata, it is a doctrine that does not require but merely permits preclusion, except (as we're about to see) when it governs choice of forum. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:16 am
This means refusing them does not result in a license suspension. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 9:47 am
If you’re a working probate attorney, elective share claims loom large in your practice. [read post]
27 May 2021, 9:14 am
“We’re merely scratching the surface of what the application of AI to our industry can mean. [read post]
