Search for: "Motion" Results 9861 - 9880 of 147,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2013, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Asks Judge Pohl, what does Iacopino add to the 706 motion? [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:47 pm by Francis Pileggi
After a somewhat unexplained procedural delay, a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) was briefed and oral argument was heard on September 15, 2014. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 3:13 pm
 Judgment was granted on 8/13 and our motion to reconsider was heard on 9/4. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 12:01 am
Over the extended holiday weekend, the defendants in the Ekstrand lawsuit filed their expected motions to dismiss. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:19 am by Steven K. Hardy
 Khalil filed a “Motion in Opposition” to the attorney's fees motion but not the motion for prejudgment interest. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:45 pm by Monté T. Squire
No. 11-742-LPS-MPT, Judge Thynge granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to consolidate and stay a later filed patent infringement suit involving the same parties and related patents. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:44 am by Gregory B. Williams
., March 3, 2016), the Court denied the motion of defendant, My Health, Inc., seeking to dismiss the complaint in the declaratory judgment action on grounds that plaintiff, Draeger Medical Systems, Inc., failed to identify actions sufficient to give rise to an “actual case or controversy” as required by Article III of the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:44 am by Gregory B. Williams
., March 3, 2016), the Court denied the motion of defendant, My Health, Inc., seeking to dismiss the complaint in the declaratory judgment action on grounds that plaintiff, Draeger Medical Systems, Inc., failed to identify actions sufficient to give rise to an “actual case or controversy” as required by Article III of the U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:35 pm
Metro contends that filing the “partial” motion to dismiss is standard and routine in a Washington DC wrongful death lawsuit. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:21 pm by Gregory B. Williams
Accordingly, in granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss in part, the Court ruled that the dismissal of Count II of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint fell squarely within the Kessler doctrine. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Like his motion for default, Dinkins's motion for default judgment is unopposed…. [read post]