Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 178,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2023, 5:31 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court held, in a motor vehicle accident case, that the trial court properly dismissed the Plaintiff’s negligence action against Defendants who were conducting an estate sale on their property after finding that the Defendants did not owe any duty to the Plaintiff to direct traffic on the road or to restrict legal, on-street parking.According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff alleged that he was injured in an accident while riding… [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
The Defendants also argued that a buffer of time and space existed in connection with the Plaintiff’s miscarriage and the delivery of her deceased fetus. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
Because Plaintiff was not in privity of contract with Defendant, its claims failed.The Court disagreed with Plaintiff’s argument that it was an intended beneficiary of the contracts between Defendant and the general contractor and, therefore, a constructive trust was created in Plaintiff’s favor. [read post]
8 May 2009, 1:30 pm
The New Jersey Appellate Division ruled that the plaintiff's false light claim was rooted in defamation, and therefore, must be dismissed because the lawsuit was not filed within the one-year statute of limitations. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 6:20 am
In this case, the Fourth District affirmed an award of prevailing party attorney's fees to a defendant after the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
The latest: plaintiff's application for $340,000 in legal fees was denied. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
The case involved plaintiffs Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. and Princeton Vanguard, LLC (collectively “Princeton Vanguard”) and defendant Frito-Lay North America, Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 3:11 am
Judge Durkin granted plaintiff’s motion to reconsider the Court’s summary judgment ruling that certain patents in suit had expired based upon a terminal disclaimer. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:39 am
Jan. 7, 2011), a unanimous Ninth Circuit en banc panel reversed the trial court finding that the plaintiff had standing to pursue claims for alleged barriers against Pier 1, instead holding that plaintiff’s complaint was "jurisdictionally defective" and that plaintiff "lacked standing at the outset of this litigation to assert the ADA claims. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 8:31 pm
Plaintiff testified that he did not see any liquid on the floor, but assumed the floor was wet because knees of his pants were wet when he got up; and defendant's store manage testified that there was no liquid on floor in vicinity of plaintiff's fall. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 9:19 pm
It must be a cold day somewhere down below when asbestos plaintiff's sue their former lawyers claiming they got ripped off to pad the settlements of other plaintiffs. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:31 am
The court granted plaintiff's motion to strike defendants' affirmative defense of unclean hands based on plaintiff's alleged improper marketing activities promoting off-label uses of its product. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:39 pm
Because, among other things, that's usually the most vulnerable part of the plaintiff's case. [read post]
10 May 2015, 9:04 am
It discusses a pending appeal before the Second Circuit over Chevron's use of civil RICO to enjoin the enforcement of the Ecuadorian judgment against them. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:33 am
John's University who decided to investigate the impact of hidden fee-sharing deals that put [...] [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:58 am
Chamber of Commerce's legal arm said today that they want to find better ways to investigate and sanction trial lawyers for alleged misconduct. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:38 pm
Two law firms that specialize in bringing securities class actions have hired lobbyists, hoping to have a greater say in the Obama administration's overhaul of Wall Street and consumer regulations. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:48 am
Here’s the abstract: For forty quarters starting in 1985,... [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:13 am
May 17, 2024) Prior ruling challenged by the Franchisee Defendants: In the original Judgment, the Court: granted Plaintiffs’ request for declaratory relief that S & S committed material breaches of the franchise agreements between the parties, giving Plaintiffs good cause to terminate the agreements; ordered Defendants and anyone acting in active concert or participation with them to immediately and fully comply with the post-termination obligations in… [read post]
29 May 2016, 7:52 am
There with issues with poor care, gaps in charting and staffing shortages – all of which resulted in a fatal outcome for decedent, plaintiff’s mother. [read post]
