Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 55,711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:10 am
That would exceed its “blue pencil” powers. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 4:32 am
As a contribution to the Issue on the fiftieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
Baker, 444 Mass. 487, 491 (2005), quoting Powers v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am
In this case, European patent application relates in particular to the modelling and the simulation of movements of a pedestrian in an environment. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:52 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 11:44 am
It takes its name from the famous case, Desny v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 11:26 am
In 2018, the Supreme Court handed down U.S. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 10:15 am
Standing up to defend the ability of tech users to hold powerful companies responsible for protecting the massive amounts of personal data they capture and store every day, EFF and co-counsel Hausfeld LLP told the high court that—contrary to the companies’ claims—Congress rightfully ensured that users could sue when those companies mishandle sensitive, private information about them.EFF filed a brief today with the Supreme Court in a case called TransUnion v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 8:51 am
The July 2020 decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:59 am
Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:26 am
”[5] Comments There are five comments that could be made about the Court of Appeal’s decision (Hussaini JCA) in A.B.U. v VTLS.[6] First, the Court of Appeal (Hussaini JCA) in A.B.U. v VTLS[7] followed Oputa JSC’s obiter dictum in Sonnar (Nig) Ltd v Partenreedri MS Norwind.[8] It should be stressed that Oputa JSC’s obiter dictum is not binding on lower courts according to the Nigerian common law doctrine of stare decisis. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:14 pm
V, § 2. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:02 pm
The court, ruling in Americans For Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 8:50 am
Parler v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 8:32 am
Words are powerful and we’re so used to having this unconscious bias.... [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:25 am
That snarkiest of justices, John Roberts, called The Brethren “advice columnists” in his first and only solo dissent in Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission v. [read post]