Search for: "State v House" Results 9861 - 9880 of 27,849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2017, 3:33 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act - Funding)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn the Interest of: S.E. and B.E. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:33 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act - Funding)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn the Interest of: S.E. and B.E. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 12:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
House of Representatives – a map giving the Democrats a 7-to-1 control of the delegation. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 11:51 am by Vanessa Sauter
Sarah Grant summarized Judge Cooper’s opinion on motion in limine in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma focuses on the cert petition in one of the cases, Karsjens v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am by Garrett Hinck
The Supreme Court stayed the Ninth Circuit’s September 7 decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm by Garrett Hinck
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Matthew Kahn flagged the government’s motion to limine in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:44 am by Howard Friedman
As previously reported, last week the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in State of Hawaii v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:18 am by Mithun Mansinghani
The state of Oklahoma, through Attorney General Mike Hunter, joined a 20-state amicus brief led by the state of Texas in support of the petitioners, a bakery corporation and its owner, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Among other criticisms, Richardson states that when officers went to her house to retrieve her vehicle, she did not come to the door. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
He contends that he stated the gist of a meritorious claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective for not arguing that the State knowingly used false or misleading testimony to obtain the indictment. . . .People v. [read post]