Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 13,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 4:28 am
In Overton v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 pm
More: ABA Journal; City of Livonia Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm
`(c) Limitations- `(1) IN GENERAL- State requirements and regulations prescribed pursuant to this section must be in accordance with objective, competitive, and transparent processes designed to ensure the highest quality of emergency medical care and patient safety, best outcomes, and access to life-saving emergency medical services as part of an integrated emergency medical services system. `(2) PRICES- This section shall not be construed to allow… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:30 am
” HP’s website stated, “Lower-priced laser printer toner delivers just what you'd expect. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:58 am
Supreme Court in connection with Morrison v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:07 am
UNITED STATES 09-11556 TOLENTINO, JOSE v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
(PatLit) United States US Patent Reform US Patent Reform: America Invents Act passes Senate with broad support and status update (Maryland IP Law Blog) (IPblog) (Patent Law Practice Center) Post-disclosure grace period – unique but good policy (Patently-O) What are the provisions of the proposed ‘First-inventor-to-file’ System in S. 23? [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 2:26 pm
State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
The Court extended that Amendment, and with it, the exclusionary rule, to state and local governments in the 1961 case of Mapp v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
., Hale v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:03 am
” Batson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:50 am
During this time, securities traded on the TSX-V were subject to price restrictions (the tick test) and the study finds that the price of securities traded fell further and faster than the price of TSX stocks, which were generally exempt from the tick test. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:48 am
Keurig, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
Keurig, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
In Patel v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
And they'd be especially devastating for states like Kentucky and other coal states. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
The best answer, then, would be for the Supreme Court to revisit its conclusion in the 1992 case Quill Corporation v North Dakota, which required a physical presence in order for states to mandate collection of their sales taxes by companies that make sales to their residents. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
On February 28, 2011, in the case of Price v. [read post]
