Search for: "State v. Still"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 44,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
However, 44 argued cases are still pending, and will be decided before the end of the Term. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The RRT proved willing to accept that treatment of this kind was not contingent upon formal criminalisation, as in 1200247 [2012] at [158]:[T]he Tribunal accepts that the negative attitude of the general public towards homosexuals is still reflected in the police force and in other state agencies, as well as in government itself, and that private persecution of homosexuals could be condoned by the police such that it takes on an official quality.In 1414394 [2016], the only… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The RRT proved willing to accept that treatment of this kind was not contingent upon formal criminalisation, as in 1200247 [2012] at [158]:[T]he Tribunal accepts that the negative attitude of the general public towards homosexuals is still reflected in the police force and in other state agencies, as well as in government itself, and that private persecution of homosexuals could be condoned by the police such that it takes on an official quality.In 1414394 [2016], the only… [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:49 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court ruling of Atkins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
Meanwhile, Murray Energy Corp v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:13 pm
McMahon on Barger Wolen’s Litigation Management and Attorney Fee Analysis Blog The Combs v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
While waiting for the 11th Circuit decision, a few issues still linger: Athletes are not machines. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 12:43 am
After Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 9:56 am
The Court clarified, however, that an employee still risks having the lawsuit dismissed if he or she does not first file a charge with the EEOC or relevant state agency. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:47 am
After this order, Apple contended that the Samsung production was still woefully inadequate and the court issued a further order directing Samsung to comply by December 31, 2011 and stating that failure to comply would subject Samsung to sanctions. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 9:53 pm
DeJoy and Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
Tugendhat J refused to make such a determination (Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB)). [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:02 pm
However, the remainder of the factors still favoured the defendant, including that the defendant had an arguable defence. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 11:07 am
See MHA Handbook, v. 3.0, Section 1.2 Additional Factors Impacting HAMP Eligibility. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The question in Buma v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
In Matter of Peterson v. [read post]
