Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 9861 - 9880 of 13,898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2011, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 12:29 pm by Josh Myers
 Manufacturers who have filed the appeal are: Actavis, Inc., Mylan, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, and UDL Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:10 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
The Kat refers, in particular, to the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in The Association of Molecular Pathology & Ors v The USPTO and Myriad Genetics Inc, __ F.3d __ (available here) (CAFC, 2011). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:56 am by Susan Brenner
On appeal, though, Teague developed her reasons for requesting funding for an expert. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm by Phillip V. Marano
Marano and Liubov Ebralidze, First Circuit Prescribes eBay Injunction Treatment For Trademark Cases, WORLD TRADEMARK REVIEW DAILY, June 17, 2011.Comment:This article briefs a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit re a motion to preliminarily enjoin alleged trademark infringement in Voice of the Arab World v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:29 pm by Nietzer
CHANGWON, South Korea, Aug. 1 (Yonhap) — “More than 27,000 iPhone users in South Korea have paid to join a class-action suit against the Korean unit of the U.S. electronics giant Apple Inc., claiming that Apple breached their privacy by tracking and storing their location, a law firm engaged in the case said Monday. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
Actavis Elizabeth LLC et al, Case No. 2010-1500 in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, decided July 29, 2011. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
” In a new published decision, the United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, addressed the exclusivity provision, Section 905(a), as it applied to a borrowing employer. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
On appeal to the Supreme Court, AT&T argued that the FAA preempted the unconscionably finding, despite the savings clause, as California law discriminated against arbitration clauses in violation of the FAA. [read post]