Search for: "United States v. Peoples"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 22,958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2016, 3:32 pm
The State based its argument on the approach set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Landgraf v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:11 am
Canada is not the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:23 am
But here’s the part that teary-eyed advocates prefer not to discuss: These are people who have entered or remained in the United States illegally. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:09 pm
” In contrast, after United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
Background The 1968 Gun Control Act requires that people who make or sell firearms in the United States be licensed and deal only in firearms with serial numbers and paperwork that allow the government to trace the weapons. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:42 am
United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:46 pm
” In contrast, after United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm
The United States formally confirmed that it made a “mistake” in accidently striking Syrian regime forces instead of Islamic State fighters on September 17th, the BBC tells us. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:19 am
Let’s begin with the constitutional text, here from section 1 of the 14th Amendment: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:20 am
But for providers that aim for data localization — putting the data in the country or region of its users — domestic law enforcement can generally use warrants to get the emails of people in the United States but need to use mutual legal assistance to get emails of those abroad. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
That follows from the originalist view that the Constitution’s text means today what the people of the United States understood it to mean when it was ratified. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
On the first day after a long Thanksgiving weekend, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, a petition filed by Samsung earlier this month for a further rehearing en banc in an Apple v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
After Larry’s death and the consequent delay, some of the other chapters needed to be updated and, given the caliber of contributors to this volume, that meant convincing some very busy people to make more time for this project. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
On November 30th, the ACLU will be in the Supreme Court to argue a case that will decide the fate of thousands of people languishing in immigration prisons across the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:52 pm
The other time was in 2000; that election was resolved via the SCOTUS decison in Bush v Gore.All of this has us over here at the Law Blogger re-examining the indirect method by which we select our president through the electoral college.The electoral college is rooted in Article II of the United States Constitution, as fine-tuned by the Twelfth Amendment. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
United States Ryan Larson, the man c [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 8:05 am
United States (1997) and New York v. [read post]
