Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 9881 - 9900
of 17,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
This discusses the case of Re Jane (a child) [2010] EWHC 3221 (Fam) in which Mr Justice Holman restricted the operation of an injunction to those notified of the application in advance. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
In Matal v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 8:00 pm
One recent interlocutory decision in Hamza v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Flores, but re-enacted in 2000. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Canada An application to set aside a default judgement granted in a defamation action in April 2021 was refused because the applicant did not meet the burden of proving that, on the balance of probabilities, allowing the order to stand constitutes a miscarriage of justice, Port Alberni Shelter Society v Literacy Alberni Society [2022] BCSC 239. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:31 am
In Peter v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:38 pm
A. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
Justice Samuel Alito, the author of the Dobbs decision overruling Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am
R (Bourgass & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 16-17 February 2015. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:03 am
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled yesterday in Byrd v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Merpel doesn't get out of bed for any IPEC (né Patents County Court) judgment -- but Brundle v Perry [2014] EWHC 979 isn't any IPEC judgment. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 5:04 pm
Like what you're reading? [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
See Re: Sound v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:24 am
The result is that the dictum by Mrs Justice Proudman in Meltwater, ie that “the test of quality has been re-stated but … not significantly altered by Infopaq” (para 81), possibly (and regrettably) still remains the most explicit stance in this respect. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:06 pm
In 1959, the Court held in Williams v. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 2:22 am
The Court referred to CNQ v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:36 pm
That right to appointed counsel was confirmed by Justice Hugo Black writing for the majority in Gideon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:23 am
Near v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
Each of the presentations was extremely interesting; I couldn’t hope to do any of them justice here. [read post]
