Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9881 - 9900
of 55,711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm
After a term at the pinnacle of his power, the Chief stands alone. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:55 pm
The case of Trump v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:37 pm
See, e.g., Bloom v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:53 am
SCOTUS decided Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:43 am
” Article V of the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:26 am
Board of County Com'rs, County of Kay) You are mentally incapacitated (,Roberts v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:26 am
Board of County Com'rs, County of Kay) You are mentally incapacitated (,Roberts v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:46 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The Court held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil service commission becomes and is the actual appointing power" [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32]. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:03 am
This is the first Reg FD enforcement action that we’ve seen in a couple of years – the Enforcement Division does indeed seem to be “powering up” and wasting no time in bringing litigation. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
The Court held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil service commission becomes and is the actual appointing power" [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32]. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
They are also demanding the abolition of a lese majeste law which shields the kingdom’s ultra-powerful King Maha Vajiralongkorn and the royal family from defamation, and carries penalties of up to 15 years per charge. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 11:28 am
Aviva Investors Ground Rent GP LTd & Anor v Williams & Ors (2021) EWCA Civ 27 Lease wording on apportionment of service charges to the effect that “your share of the overall charge is X% or such part as the Landlord may otherwise reasonably determine” did not mean that the specified percentage was fixed and that the Tribunal had no power to specify a different percentage. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 11:23 am
Berryhill v. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 4:26 am
IndiaSarmila v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 1:45 pm
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 1:02 pm
’ ‘These did not strike me as obviously powerful points. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
On this episode, plaintiffs from the landmark case of Monroe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See, Marbury v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
