Search for: "True v True"
Results 9881 - 9900
of 33,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2008, 11:32 pm
I still don't think that what Justice Mihara asserts is true. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:47 am
” That's totally true. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:10 pm
All of which is true, I'm sure. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:08 pm
, and (2) How is that possibly true, since the guy's a cook, not a pirate? [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:45 pm
At least in theory.But if that's true, why do we allow -- as we clearly do -- the witness to be asked in a deposition what questions he was asked (and how the witness answered)? [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
But to get a true tenor of what the panel means by this, listen to the oral argument. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
" Even if that were true, however, the dissenters counter that "it is not this Court's task to decide whether the statutory scheme established by Congress is unusual or even ‘[b]izarre.' The Court must decide only whether the construction adopted by the agency is unambiguously foreclosed by the statute's text. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm
I'm positive that they are true believers, and profoundly respect their decision. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:43 am
But it's literally true as well. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:38 am
(I'm not saying here that in fact this is true; I'm merely stating this as hypothesis). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:12 pm
If it's true (as we must assume on a 12b6 motion) that it is possible to grab blood marrow just by taking blood, how's that any different than -- well -- giving blood, for which you can be paid. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am
” The ACLU supplements this argument with its own case that Exemptions 1 and 3 do not apply, noting that even if “there are some responsive documents that cannot be identified or described without disclosing information protected by Exemptions 1 or 3, the declarations do not logically or plausibly establish that this is true of every responsive document. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm
But the former's true -- those are the words of the statute -- but not the latter. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:57 am
True enough.But Bernard's estate paid estate tax. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:46 pm
It is true that Section 5 limits judicial intervention in the manner provided therein. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:24 pm
Not merely assume without deciding that it's true, which is what the California Supreme Court does here. any set of facts that might suffice, the indictment stands, right? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm
I hope that John Pollock’s optimism in that regard proves true, but with many states facing the bleakest fiscal outlook on record, advocates must turn a keen eye to ensuring that Turner does not signal a retreat from existing rights. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
" Justice Sims defends this comment by saying that "on a cold transcript we do not know the tone with which this comment was delivered," a statement that's technically true. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:53 am
Here is much of the opinion from an interesting libel case of his, Bustos v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:50 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
