Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 9881 - 9900 of 14,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2012, 8:49 am by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Wednesday, February 15 Criminal Justice: The United States Sentencing Commission will begin a two day hearing to discuss federal sentencing since the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am by Mark Patrick
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion, and the United States Supreme Court denied applications for certiorari from both sides. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am by Mark Patrick
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion, and the United States Supreme Court denied applications for certiorari from both sides. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Each of them had been viewed thousands or tens of thousands of times by individuals throughout the world, including the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:54 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As of the close of 2014, Wal-Mart had been cited a total of 571 times in lower federal and state court rulings. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  We have had 450,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and the Philippines making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:33 pm
The Court noticed this in Texas Monthly v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:01 am by Steve Hall
In a closely divided 4-to-3 ruling, the State Supreme Court wrongly upheld the statute on the grounds that the United States Supreme Court left it to the states to set procedures for deciding on retardation. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/ON5e4Dgt2y -> New anti-spam laws aimed at safer online world http://t.co/4KVM3vv5BL -> Organisations using privacy policies 'to protect themselves', says ICO http://t.co/ZEydJ1rB4U -> ASCAP President Paul Williams’ “State Of The Union” To Songwriters! [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 2:16 am by Jeremy Saland
” “Similarly, the defendant may be properly charged with criminal contempt for being in close enough proximity to the protected party so as to be considered in her presence (see Hijri v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:50 am by SHG
See United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court is regularly subjected to such arguments, especially from amici (including foreign government amici). [read post]