Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 9901 - 9920 of 48,946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2020, 1:58 pm by Mark Tushnet
Justice Scalia’s opinion for the Court in MCI Telecommunications v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am by John Jascob
The appellate panel also rejected arguments that amended Regulation A should be vacated as arbitrary and capricious because the SEC failed to explain adequately how the rule protects investors (Lindeen v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Adam Baker
The decision to award to the second lowest bidder was based on a “net present value” method of financial analysis where prices submitted were adjusted by adding costs that the Department expected to incur as a result of choosing a particular bidder (primarily fit-up costs). [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The oft-repeated ‘floodgates’ argument is a non-starter, given the usual protections afforded by our legal system (not least of which is loser pays winner’s costs). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by David Smith
Sibthorpe & Morris v LB Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 25 Champerty and maintenance are two common law doctrines relating to the funding of civil claims. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by David Smith
Sibthorpe & Morris v LB Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 25 Champerty and maintenance are two common law doctrines relating to the funding of civil claims. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:34 am by Joe Palazzolo
Click fraud: In a “pay-per-click” system, competitors can drive up each others’ costs by clicking one another’s ads. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:29 am by Corbin K. Barthold
If this question interests you, Robinson’s decision in National Petroleum Refiners v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:55 am by Heather Dadashi
That’s what’s at stake in a case called Patz v. [read post]