Search for: "Courts and Judicial System"
Results 9901 - 9920
of 26,745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2017, 2:59 am
is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:41 pm
This is why it would be inappropriate for an IMR of a judicial decision to be conducted; it would, effectively, be one judge (or group of judges) commenting upon the decisions of another judge outside the proper appellate process…This principle evolved in order to protect the rule of law – it reinforces the idea that the only way to challenge a judicial decision is to do so in court, not to seek to undermine it outside the court process. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:00 pm
Ferguson, of the 394th Judicial District Court in Brewster County. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s refusal to vacate labor awards on public policy grounds to illustrate her point: The majority finds grounds to vacate the award at issue under a judicially fashioned “public-policy” exception to the bar against judicial review of arbitral awards. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:50 am
” [5] Under the EPA, a wage disparity is permissible if an employer can plead and prove an affirmative defense based on one of the following exceptions: (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:42 am
It explains the jury system’s roots in the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:44 pm
Judicial estoppel, described as the doctrine against the assertion of inconsistent positions, is a tool used by courts to impede those litigants that “play `fast and loose’ with the legal system. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
Not every offhand comment indicating racial bias or hostility will justify setting aside the no-impeachment bar to allow further judicial inquiry. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:09 am
Your appearance should signify that you are taking this matter seriously and that you respect the court and the judicial system. [read post]
4 May 2017, 7:42 am
As regards the flat fee for legal costs, the Belgian Judicial Code, Article 1022, states that the party prevailing in court proceedings cannot claim a higher compensation for lawyer fees than the flat fees stipulated by Royal Decree. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am
Murphy, Judicial Deference, Agency Commitment, and Force of Law, 66 OHIO ST. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:36 am
The State Bar of Texas is encouraging everyone to use the social media hashtag “#ThankAJuror” this week to “honor the service of those who give of their time to participate in the American judicial system. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
Merit Systems Protection Board. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:47 am
Mekat: The interplay between the provisions of the EU Service Regulation and the German Regulation on Judicial Assistance in Civil Matters (ZRHO) concerning the service of judicial documents to foreign States The authors examine the interplay between the provisions of the EU Service Regulation and the German Regulation on Judicial Assistance in Civil Matters (Rechtshilfeordnung für Zivilsachen, abbreviated “ZRHO”) in the field of service of… [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Whenever Trump loses in court, he attacks the personal integrity of the judges who ruled against him or even the legal system as a whole.Those attacks will not be effective in the courts themselves. [read post]
2 May 2017, 12:52 pm
Our judicial system is critical to maintaining our liberty. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:01 am
In short, the Court ruled that the Plaintiffs’ lawsuit could not proceed without damaging the integrity and proper functioning of the judicial system. [read post]
2 May 2017, 4:30 am
” Once he perceived consistency, he gained confidence that a system of coordinated state-centric reforms could produce the kinds of regulatory uniformity that the national economy required and that the administration of law by state courts, and not some unifying federal common law, could best serve the nation. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
Here is the ICSID Archive of all the background material.Some Perceptions about the AwardMichael Geist, who is not shy when it comes to critical comment on Canadian policy, quickly opined that:The Tribunal decision represents an enormous win for the Canadian government and for the supremacy of Canadian law and the judicial system more broadly. [read post]
