Search for: "In Interest of C." Results 9901 - 9920 of 42,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2007, 5:30 am
In 2001, a private equity firm, formed in part by David Stockman, acquired a controlling interest in C&A. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
B/c a court said the DMCA means what it says, and that hasn’t happened before b/c courts have not required a representative list or applied red flag notice. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:40 pm
Below are my last 51 bankruptcy case tweets of August 2011 and 6 other tweets of general interest since my last post of August 25. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
S., at 27, and the real party in interest is the individual, not the sovereign.Defendants in an official-capacity action may assert sovereign immunity. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:05 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Persons having a direct interest in the arbitration are entitled to attend hearings. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Regardless, “[c]ourts that have deemed ‘Made in USA’ claims material have been offered much richer evidentiary records,” including actual retailer testimony. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Dole shareholders filed multiple lawsuits against Dole, Murdock, and the company’s General Counsel and Chief Operating Officer, C. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm by James Hamilton
The swap dealer and swap participant would also have a duty to act in the best interests of the special entity, disclose material information concerning the security-based swap, and provides written representations on fair pricing and appropriateness of the security-based swap. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:25 am by Kelly Buchanan
  “Undesirable in the public interest” is then defined later in the section: (8) For the purposes of this section, it is undesirable in the public interest for a person to bear a name or combination of names if, and only if, (a) it might cause offence to a reasonable person; or (b) it is unreasonably long; or (c) without adequate justification, it is, includes, or resembles, an official title or rank. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
Please contact me directly if you are interested in submitting a guest post. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:39 am by Dave
(c) Qualifying persons: Local authorities can now set their own criteria for qualifying persons and it will be interesting to see what they come up with. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:21 am by gmlevine
At its simplest a prima facie case requires the complainant to establish that in using the domain name the respondent is not making a bona fide offering of goods or services [paragraph 4(c)(ii)], is not commonly known by the domain name [paragraph 4(c)(ii)] and is not making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name or otherwise justified in using the domain name on free speech principles [paragraph 4(c)(iii)]. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm by Daniel O'Rielly
  Plaintiff argued that the interest rate change constituted a change in the "periodic rate" of his account, which would require subsequent disclosure under 226.9(c)(1). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:41 am by admin
Nonetheless, Belk might warrant a closer look if it is going to continue to guide the Court’s interpretation of IRC 170(h)(2)(C). [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:41 am by admin
Nonetheless, Belk might warrant a closer look if it is going to continue to guide the Court’s interpretation of IRC 170(h)(2)(C). [read post]