Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 9901 - 9920
of 51,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 1:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 9:17 am
By the time it got to Brown v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:46 am
But as the Third Department's decision last week in People v Revette, 2008 NY Slip Op 01452 demonstrates, this does not mean an Indictment cannot be dismissed because of such a relationship. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 3:06 am
The theory is an extension of Lewis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
In Kisor v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 2:33 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s one thing that puzzles me about United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
My presentation is called “The Tort Threshold in Car Accident Cases: McCormick v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:10 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:49 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:01 am
The taxpayer loses.This is the tale of Balestra v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 11:36 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
We attempted to file an amicus brief in Doe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Or what your client was doing at the time.DAWSON In People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:19 am
Penal Code § 502); (5) intentional interference with Meta’s contracts with its users; and (6) violation of the “unlawful,” “unfair,” and “fraudulent” prongs of the UCL The parties have vigorously litigated this case. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:10 pm
In both cases, if they have enough assets, a probate court has to supervise the settling of the estate. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1959 case of Bibb v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:47 pm
Rejectiong this argument, the Fourth Department held that The court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the expert's testimony would not be relevant in view of the facts of this case (see generally People v Young, 7 NY3d 40, 44-45; People v Lee, 96 NY2d 157, 162). [read post]
