Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 9901 - 9920 of 22,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
The plaintiffs and their treaters are often from the same state, which means there's no diversity of citizenship and no opportunity for the out-of-state drug company to remove the case to federal court.Any case that helps drug companies avoid that result is worth a minute's thought.Joseph v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
International Law/Class Actions: Act of State Doctrine; Customary International LawNevsun Resources Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 11:12 am by Larry
See, e.g., Chrysler v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:00 am by Sarah Phillips
The explanation from the court in the recent case National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
Circuit, in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am by INFORRM
The UK Supreme Court today handed down judgment in the case of Coventry v Lawrence ([2015] UKSC 50) [pdf]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:33 pm
  The court simply decides whether the plaintiff meets its burden in demonstrating that its proposed amended pleading is sufficient under the current state of the law. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Journalists: DisclosureDenis v. [read post]