Search for: "UNITED STATE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT"
Results 9901 - 9920
of 36,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2019, 2:36 pm
The Court’s Decision The United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Savannah Division, granted summary judgment to the defendants. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 7:07 am
On October 2, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Tweed Financial Services, Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 4:35 am
At this point, the claimant can appeal to the United States District Court, and if that does not go well, then the claimant can appeal to the United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:44 pm
If the lower courts reject your appeals, it is unlikely your case will be heard before the United States Supreme Court, as they only hear a select number of cases and it is not likely that your appeal would be taken to them. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:44 pm
If the lower courts reject your appeals, it is unlikely your case will be heard before the United States Supreme Court, as they only hear a select number of cases and it is not likely that your appeal would be taken to them. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:55 am
Declares these provisions apply to Federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
(Walden is being sued in federal, rather than state, court, but the federal rules in this case rely on the state’s jurisdiction.) [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:10 am
In considering RJR’s motion to dismiss, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York determined that the racketeering enterprise alleged in the complaint was a foreign enterprise “which consisted largely of a loose association of Colombian and Russian drug-dealing organizations and European money brokers whose activity was directed outside the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:43 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled Wednesday that police officers who conducted a no-knock raid on a house and injured four unarmed people were not subject to qualified immunity, a type of immunity that protects individual government officials from being sued over acts in the course of their duties. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:04 am
The United States Supreme Court has frequently noted the importance of the IDEA procedural safeguards, finding them to be at the heart of the fairness of the process, the great equalizer. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:04 am
The United States Supreme Court has frequently noted the importance of the IDEA procedural safeguards, finding them to be at the heart of the fairness of the process, the great equalizer. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:37 pm
Finally, the court affirmed the substantial award of attorney fees and costs, stating: “The district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding Rule 54(d)(1) costs and attorney’s fees to the County. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:34 am
Supreme Court Rule 11: Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals Before Judgment. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:55 am
Do Americans continue to support the Supreme Court in the face of frequent criticism, including hostile tweets by the president of the United States? [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Opp. 16 n.1 (citing the United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:22 pm
In Termo Rio, it was held: when a competent foreign court has nullified a foreign arbitration award, United States courts should not go behind that decision absent extraordinary circumstances not present in this case. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:58 am
Although the district court correctly rejected Schmitt's argument about federal/state disparities, we cannot be confident that it approached the guidelines in the way that United States v. [read post]
Court Upholds New Jersey Law Prohibiting Job Ads Requiring Job Applicants Who Are Currently Employed
30 Jan 2014, 4:45 am
Crest Ultrasonics the Court ruled the statute is narrowly tailored to advance the State's substantial interest, and therefore does not violate the state or federal Constitution. [read post]
