Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 9901 - 9920 of 13,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 2:07 pm
 A position that certainly is not without logic and appeal. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Czech Republic Czech Arbitration Court wants to speed up UDRP process (Managing Intellectual Property) Finland Finland, Spain bringing 1Mbps broadband to everyone (Ars Technica) Germany More on IPCom and its litigation with HTC in Germany (IAM) India Google Book settlement – Indian government protests... finally (Spicy IP) Cybersquatting gets sharp rap from INDRP Arbitration: Bloomberg finance wins (Spicy IP) Sweden Swedish internet traffic recovers after initial… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm by Christa Culver
HumphreyDocket: 10-949Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:04 am
Asset Marketing Inc., No. 05-CV-00633 (S.D.Cal.), filed in March 2005, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, and certified as a state-wide class action (covering a class that “partially overlaps the Negrete class”) in July 2006; Mooney v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
(China Hearsay)   Czech Republic Pirate Parties parade through Prague, Paris (Ars Technica)   France L'Oréal and eBay will meet again, for mediation and before the Court of Appeal in case concerning auction site’s liability for counterfeit sales (Class 46) Pirate Parties parade through Prague, Paris (Ars Technica)   Germany File-sharing site, Rapidshare fined 24m euros; Rapidshare announces intent to appeal (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The decision of Tugendhat J in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 14 (QB)) was widely discussed in the media. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:41 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (DC Cir. 1923). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:18 pm by Gene Quinn
Several years ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided a copyright infringement case requiring them to address whether the developer or the company was the owner of underlying copyrights. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:53 pm
United Parcel Serv., Inc., decided last month by the Hamilton County Court of Appeals, rejects that longstanding conventional wisdom, and holds that plaintiffs have six years to bring such age claims. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:31 am by Chris Jaglowitz
Talon International Development Inc., 2011 ONCA 687 In a case related to the new Trump Tower in Toronto, the Ontario Court of Appeal agreed that a purchaser was entitled to terminate his new condo purchase agreement because the developer failed to provide occupancy and close the transaction on the specific closing date set out in the agreement. [read post]