Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9901 - 9920
of 13,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 9:06 am
The recent California appellate court decision in Henderson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 2:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:55 pm
People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:41 pm
Landmark Missouri v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:47 pm
" Uccello v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:04 pm
Watkins/Proctor & Gamble Professor of Law, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Nicole Porter, The Sentencing Project Panel III: The Criminalization of Immigration Law Since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in INS v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:51 pm
Today, in United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:15 pm
In Lawton v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:36 am
It’s uncharted territory, but I seriously doubt that pervasive and persistent surveillance of that nature comports with the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
However, as the Supreme Court recognized in the famous 1946 case of United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm
The case was transferred and consolidated in the Northern District of California. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
House of Representativesin response to the United States International Trade Commission's mid-December notice relating to the ITC's investigation of Qualcomm's first complaint against Apple (with Qualcomm seeking an import ban, which is the ITC's sole remedy).The United States Senators and United States Representatives who filed those letters, which support Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:50 pm
On November 18, 2013 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revived Apple's bid for a permanent patent injunction against Samsung's Android-based devices with respect to three multitouch software patents (rubber-banding, tap-to-zoom-and-navigate, and pinch-to-zoom API), while affirming Judge Lucy Koh's denial of injunctive relief with respect to the asserted design patents. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:36 am
The first prayer for relief asks the United States District Court for the Southern District of California to do the following:"Enjoin Defendants from violating the terms and conditions of their License Agreements and/or require Defendants specifically to perform the obligations of their License Agreements, including (i) timely making full and complete payments of royalties for any and all sales of Subscriber Units, (ii) providing Qualcomm's auditors all… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
A California District Court upheld a school’s decision to prevent students wearing the flag on their T shirts on Cinco de Mayo (a day of Mexican celebration across the United States when the Mexican flag is often worn). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:32 am
In Tory v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
The issue before the Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
