Search for: "W. D." Results 9901 - 9920 of 13,762
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
Pulse Trading, Inc (Docket Report) District Court W D Virginia: Intervening rights absolve of damages for activities before reexamination certificate issue date: University of Virginia Patent Foundation v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:51 pm by Real Estate Mediation
Mediator Jim W Hildreth stepped in, and, after almost four hours of trial, Tuohy and Renkel agreed to do what they’d reportedly been kicking around all day: offer the creature up to the Tuolumne County Museum. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:31 am by Bexis
On this last day of the 2010, we'd like to wish our readers a happy, healthy, and prosperous new year. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:32 pm by David Lat
In fact, the idea for this post came from an in-house reader: “[W]hy not have a holiday schwag column to show what in-house counsel are getting from firms this season? [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:10 am by Martin George
Lein, The Optional Instrument for European Contract Law and the Conflict of Laws W. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:50 am
But [d]espite its broad deterrent purpose, the exclusionary rule has never been interpreted to proscribe the use of illegally seized evidence in all proceedings or against all persons. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:28 pm by Brian Hollar
Friends & family are sponsoring me $1/day I travel w/ no bags, pledging $415 in donations so far. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:29 pm by David Cheifetz
W contracted AIDS from a transfusion of HIV-infected blood. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 7:19 am by Juana Vasella
Die Industriellen Werke dürften im Übrigen regelmässig ohne weiteres Kenntnis davon haben, wer Mieter einer Liegenschaft ist, da sie auch mit diesen in einem Benützungsverhältnis stehen. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:57 am by Marie Louise
Holdings v Metabolite Labs (Patents Post Grant) US: District Court Arizona: Question of whether to incur ‘substantial expenses’ for testing and clinical trials does not create substantial controversy sufficient to assert declaratory relief claim: W L Gore & Assoc. v GI Dynamics (Docket Report) US: Correction of inventorship complaint: Salk Institute for Biological Studies v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 2:57 am by Larry Ribstein
  Felten quotes Armstrong as recognizing that “[w]e are not going to develop an impartial, universal love overnight. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Juana Vasella
Im Hinblick auf Art. 1 StGB ist Art. 4 Abs. 1 lit. d WG restriktiv auszulegen. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm by Michael Geist
W is for Wikileaks, which was alternately lauded or vilified for making thousands of previously secret government cables available online. [read post]