Search for: "York v York"
Results 9901 - 9920
of 50,419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 8:07 am
Supplementary Underinsured Motorist benefits in New York extend coverage beyond the limits of the at-fault driver’s insurance policy. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 4:32 pm
Citing Meyer v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 3:35 am
Fieldston Property Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:18 am
Theodore Mirvis comments on London v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
Volokh v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 3:00 am
Like students who choose to go to college in a small town to avoid the distractions of big-city life, the venture capitalists at Foundry Group have shunned Silicon Valley or New York for Boulder, where they practice back-to-the-basics venture capital. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 10:41 am
By Eric Goldman Murawski v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:30 am
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 4:20 am
We discussed Gilbo v Horowitz 2018 NY Slip Op 31844(U) July 31, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158727/2017 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 10:36 pm
An important recent New York County case for the defense practitioner: Milligan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS).
Sorted by Category:
Bill No.
A1485
Gunther (MS) -- Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for lifeSUMM : Amd SS168-h & 168-o, Cor L Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for life. 01/09/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSA1531
Benjamin -- Provides guidelines for evaluating applications for barbers and cosmetology license where applicant has prior… [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:08 am
The surprising thing is that V&E New York associates seem to be much happier with the news than V&E Houston associates. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:50 am
Grant v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
Cheryl BeiseIn a trademark dispute over use of the brand name ROGUE for clothing, the federal district court in New York City erred by ruling on summary judgment that an apparel manufacturer was the rightful owner of the mark for clothing, and that an Oregon brewery was only entitled to sell clothing under the ROGUE Mark as complements to and in promotion of its own brewing business, U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Amirsaleh v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:30 am
But, according to attorney Doug Kepanis, at least one New York judge requires more: In the case of Strack v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 5:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:10 pm
” Click here to read the full opinion: Upsolve-v-James-5-24-22. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 12:33 am
Roy L.N., Jr. v. [read post]