Search for: "Banks v. US"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 14,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
In doing so, the Court effectively overruled the Federal Circuit’s State Street Bank v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:46 pm
Filburn, Gibbons v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:34 am
" In assessing how to judge the prosecution's conduct, the Court quoted the oft-cited ruling in Berger v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:08 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:30 am
This list keeps residents informed of the Authority's ongoing efforts to improve the quality of life for New Yorkers in public housing and to allow for the peaceful and safe use of its facilities. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:35 am
Code §§ 1028(a)(7), 1029(a)(2) and 2, involving the use of stolen credit-card, debit-card, and bank numbers to obtain goods and services; and (3) one count of aggravated identity theft/aiding and abetting, 18 U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Another great Chicagoan, Judge Richard Posner, recently came out with a pair of opinions that brought us some joy and reminded us of what good legal reasoning and writing looks like. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
An appellate court decision issued last week in Lehey v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
The foundational case is Lyus v Prowsa Developments [1982] 1 WLR 1044, but, as Lloyd LJ noted, there were three key points about that case: (a) Ms Lyus’ right didn’t bind the bank, which sold the property; (b) Ms Lyus’ right was specifically identified in the bank’s contract of sale; and (c) Ms Lyus could not have done any more to protect her right. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
The foundational case is Lyus v Prowsa Developments [1982] 1 WLR 1044, but, as Lloyd LJ noted, there were three key points about that case: (a) Ms Lyus’ right didn’t bind the bank, which sold the property; (b) Ms Lyus’ right was specifically identified in the bank’s contract of sale; and (c) Ms Lyus could not have done any more to protect her right. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
V. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 8:07 pm
A good starting place to discuss the evolution of the patentable subject matter requirement is the landmark 1998 decision State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:59 pm
I have defended US IP owners against infringements by non-US entities. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 12:48 pm
The Court considered the case of Bank of Scotland v Pereira in some detail. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 12:48 pm
The Court considered the case of Bank of Scotland v Pereira in some detail. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 10:38 am
For example, where a bonus is paid to a shareholder that is returned to the company for use as working capital. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
Editor’s Note: The following post comes to us from Lawrence V. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:24 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
