Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 13,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
§§ 6(a)(1) and (6), 88 Stat. 58, 60, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
_____________________________ [1] See 395804 Ontario Ltd. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 2:46 pm
II:7, quoting from proposed new Guidelines § 15064.3(b)(1).) [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
But it does undermine the claim that Bruen is about protecting white people. [1]. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Social & legal studies, 29(1), 107-145. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 5:12 pm
> 3526 (2008), for taxable years beginning after August 29, 2008. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
”[12]Article 100 became Article 53 in the current 1984 version of the Constitution, and the language of the article remained mostly unchanged. [13] Article 53 deals with the duties of the citizens, it does not explicitly provide means for the state to exercise judicial authority. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm
§ 802(6). 1. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
How does that affect your space? [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 7:57 am
1. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:18 pm
The jury reached a verdict on July 29. . . .Tanubagijo moved for a new trial pursuant to section 1181, subdivision (3), arguing P.D. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 3:27 pm
This blog previously dealt with one flavor of “fake news”: provocative fictions that can prompt panic and violence.[1] These issues have not gone away; one recent headline suggested a false report prompted a nuclear threat.[2] In this blog, though, I’ll deal with a related issue: propaganda. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
This position gives rise to the following questions:1) Is the exercise of the power to promulgate Ordinances amenable to judicial review (is it justiciable)? [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 6:18 am
Loring: "1. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
That's three reasons for refusing to recognize a duty: (1) the interference with the physician/patient relation [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 4:01 pm
Nobody does "tormented" like Maria Callas. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:37 am
Table 1. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
In other words, if the corrective disclosure’s related drop in stock price does not exhibit a statistically significant stock price return after controlling for general and industry-specific factors, the court should be reluctant to approve the related stock price decline as a source of potential damages in a certified class. [read post]
